The future is bright for sales professionals ... and organizations with sales cultures

"Opportunities are usually disguised as hard work, so most people don’t recognize them."

~ Ann Landers




If you're a job seeker that falls within "sales professional" looking for inspiration or motivation, you don't have to look far.   A recent post on Linked In by Forbes Contributing Writer George Anders article "Facebook's Hiring Surprise" http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20140210021038-59549-facebook-s-hiring-surprise?trk=mp-details-rr-rmpost  forecasts a sunny future for those talented or leaning towards sales.  The enlightening article points out:

What Facebook craves these days is people who can sell.  Scan the listings on Facebook's careers page, and you'll find an impressive 170 or so openings in sales and business development.
There isn't a single technical department at Facebook that is as eager to hire. As of Feb. 9, Facebook was hunting for 97 more software engineers, another 78 infrastructure specialists, and 51 data/analytics experts. Yes, fast-growing Facebook has some openings in every section. But the demand for extra people is most intense in the time-tested world of sales.... (The exact total fluctuates slightly, day by day.) The reason: Facebook's money engine is built on advertising. Even in the highly automated world of online marketing, it turns out that making deals come together still requires a human touch.

“If opportunity doesn’t knock, build a door.”
~Milton Berle


Brilliant!  many would say.  I say:  something so obvious to me, shouldn't be a surprise.   ALL organizations, regardless of whether they are technology driven, retail/consumer, travel, etc. should be customer or oriented which translates into selling: 

  1. Asks questions about their customers business.
  2. Listens carefully to what their customers are saying.
  3. Communicating those needs to the people in the organization that can make things happen.
  4. Look for ways to improve their service to the customers, to strengthen relationship,
  5. Show customers how they can remove headaches, streamline processes,
  6. Can concisely show how that one widget or service can improve on overall costs
Organizations that are hit with a bolt of lightening that they need sales efforts may just beginning to heed B2B (Business to Business) organizations who consider every individual in their organization a sales person from the CEO who promotes the organization and what they are doing innovatively and better than anyone else, to the Chief of Finance who works financial magic on keeping costs in check while being wizards at making their offering affordable, to Marketing Gurus who maintain consistent communication across all material, social media and web platforms.  The organization mechanism churns briskly to ensure customers have the best experiences possible.

Organizations that pull together and are often recognized as being one of the "best employers" to work for because they perform as a team, one division not better or smarter or more important than the other.  The big winners are those that agree and enforce the culture that they are customer oriented and sales is a focus -- demonstrated by key words:  drive revenue, improved satisfaction, customer retention, repeat consumers, brand loyalty, customer focussed, employee expertise.  They leave the things that drive employees crazy at the board room table:  increase profitability, cost recovery, shareholder value, loss, pending layoffs.  Employees and new hires are trusting that the executive team takes care of them at the board room table while holding their middle managers accountable on all the metrics surrounding profitability, cost controls, employee turnover.

So why would Facebook suddenly start showing an obvious concentration of hiring sales professionals?  It seems clear to someone like me who started a sales career selling advertising for magazines where costs were covered by ad revenue, not subscription sales.  It would appear that the ads on Facebook are not covering the cost of operations.  Going public with a share offering would substantiate that revenue was not covering its growth.

Let's face it:  sales tend to drive revenue and capture new business which means it creates jobs to service the customers.   Often creating sales positions is a Band-Aid especially when it is used to jumpstart a business' revenue or as a stop gap to losing profits.  Sadly, sales professionals are given budgets to attain and used as a measuring stick to their overall contribution.  A clear signal is when their is a lot of turnover in the sales arena.  Turnover in sales hurts both the customers and the organization who hasn't drawn out a clear organizational chart and where accountabilities lay.   It costs money to cultivate customers, and too often looked at from a transactional perspective rather than strengthening relationships with customers.

More importantly, sales should be considered the "voice" of the customer to the organization, not just an individual selling a gadget or a one-off service. Transactional sales are a thing of the past, relationships are where it's at and sales professionals have a vested interested in maintaining relationships (think: referrals, growth opportunities of customers, problem solving) and those who have a job created because of a growth in customer base should pay attention to that communication ... or be proactively communicating what they discover as a need for the customer that the organization can solve.  The organizations that will survive and thrive don't just hire experienced sales professionals and throw them out on to the streets. 

Winners will provide continual training, reinforce excellence by recognition, attract top talent and reward those demonstrate going the extra mile to improve customer experience, track costs effectively.

There are optimization tools like CRMs (Customer Relationship Management) systems in place to effectively capture communications across all sectors from front line service personnel, customer service, operations -- not just the sales team.  The CRMs can create dashboards for close examination on performance.  However, rather than just microscope the sales efforts, examine which customers are the best ones (less complaints, pay on time, easy to service, profitability based on service needs, will collaborate on increased costs with meeting increased services).

Once you can create the ideal customer based on current profiles, interview those clients to find out what they REALLY think about their sales professional, customer service, service technicians, accounting practices, financial details, and the organization's brand. 

Take that perfect customer profile and collaborate amongst all divisions and ask what they can do to go the extra mile to ensure that they can keep that high level of satisfaction.

Ask marketing to research what avenues are the best to attract those same customers ... instead of haphazard ad campaigns that appeal to the masses, be more selective and narrow in on to programs that solidify those relationships via social media, loyalty rewards, referral rewards, personalized promotions that draw out revenue in a less painful and expensive manner.


Make it easy for your customers to do business with you!  Don't allow service, technical, or finance stonewall the customer.   I've experienced organizations that operate in small silos within large frames  that makes the weight of the relationship responsibility fall where it is less manned to keep costs in check.  Ultimately, that can lead to employee turnover and create a gap.  Customers themselves are being asked to do more with less and frequently less patient with those they pay for a service to.  Don't ask your employees to shoulder the blame and where the customer is asked to be compassionate.  They will have even less patience when they're tasked with training the replacement employee who has been thrown in with little onboarding, job shadowing or training. 

It is wise to keep corporate communications and culture private.   Who really likes to air dirty laundry or expose skeletons?  Usually disgruntled people.  In other words, don't allow employees find out the health of the organization through the media or via shareholders' displeasure.  Be upfront, create a team with a "we" attitude that everyone has a stake in the health of the organization.  You may end up surprised how many talented people you have on board who take pride in who they work for and may have ideas that can contribute to the success.  Don't leave it on one area's shoulders, like sales.   Create a culture of pride where employees are not whining to customers about cutbacks as excuses to why they aren’t getting the service or product or company they bought into.  Sales job is much easier when there is a strong brand, solid financial future, and positive media translated by customer cheerleaders.   The organization will win when both customers and employees are lined up at the door.  Shareholders will naturally gravitate to healthy organization because information is readily available and travels fast.

"If we all did the things we are capable of doing, we would literally astound ourselves."
~Thomas Edison






Mind your manners or we'll mind you!

“Whenever you are asked if you can do a job, tell ‘em, ‘Certainly I can!’ Then get busy and find out how to do it.”

~Theodore Roosevelt


One of the oddest occurrence in recruiting happened to me this week.  So odd, in fact, that I wanted to share it.   It isn't unusual, whether you are actively seeking a new career opportunity or not, for a recruiter to reach out to you to ask if you may be looking for a change, or ask whether you know someone that would make a strong candidate. 




The following email as received in my personal email out of the blue from someone I had never heard of or interacted with before or connected with on Linked In.  I edited out particulars for privacy purposes):

 


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:28 PM,

Hi Jeannette,
I am reaching out to you today for your help.

A client of mine is a large retail chain with over 250 superstores in Western Canada. Their headquarters are located in Saskatoon.
 
My client is offering xxxxxxxxxx max base(Based on seniority)+10% Bonus+15K moving bonus for a Solid Senior Business Analyst with Petrolium Systems OR Propane Systems Wholesale and maketing experience.

Here is a detailed Job Description:
 
This is a massive organization that employs over 3000 people with over 120 in IT that they hope to grow to 250 within a year.

If you are interested in moving to Saskatoon or know of anyone who would be interested in moving to Saskatoon please contact me directly with details below.
1) Attach Resume
2) Availability to interview and start
3) Your salary expectations
4) Confirm that location is ok

If this email has reached you while your area of expertise may be different then I would still like to hear from you; perhaps we will have the opportunity to do business in the future.

At the least I would like to have you on my network of Top Technology talent on LinkedIn; you may invite me at:

Thank you in advance for your support and looking forward to hearing from you.
 
Regards,
Sam
Business Development Manager, xxxxxxxx
Toronto, Ontario


The typos should have been my first clue.  Upon closer examination, it seemed apparent that it was generated via a well known job board, which I imagine meant that it was an email blast sent to many.  Typically, I am used to being contacted by recruiters from Linked In, rarely is an opening simply from an email and more often occurs after a telephone call.  Nonetheless, I have like to keep doors open with recruiters and treat them with respect as one would with a potential client or employer.  Therefore,  I did reply generically with my CV attached.  What floored me was this response today:
 


Hi Jeannette,
Please help me understand what you have done is relevant to what I am looking for.  Am I missing something from the resume I am looking at?
Many thanks, - Sam xxxx

 
A feather could have knocked me over.  My reaction initially was huh?  Secondly, how rude.  Thirdly,  fascinated that the latter email was a response to his own original email.  So much for being one of the "Top Technology Talent" on Linked.  Made me wonder why HE hadn't reached out there? 
 
A few other thoughts surface, but I'll keep those less kinder ones to myself.  Brushing up on "Business Etiquette" seemed obvious, another key that
stood out was that it was data driven.  Perhaps the Job Board offered various selection and then it spit out data of potential candidates which in turn generated the email.  It definitely points to the danger of relying on data and not intimately reviewing before starting any e-mail campaign.
 
 
I'm not a recruiter by profession yet I have done a fair amount of recruiting in my time.  What I do compare this to, sadly, is that generic sales letters are going out daily that quickly end up in the "trash".  What a waste of effort and reputation!

 Several pitfalls on this email stood out:

  • It is obviously generic
  • No tracking kept on who it was sent to
  • Poor memory that an email had been sent out
  • Names weren't pre-qualified by being looked up on Linked In
  • Lack of understanding on parameters selected to generate recipients.

It also speaks of laziness and I'd be embarrassed if I were Sam.  More so, if I were his employer.  He apparently was seeking top tier professionals, but wasn't acting in the same fashion.  Perhaps more likely generating activity than attracting the top tier talent to meet the goal of hiring a suitable candidate.

Do you think I looked him up on Linked in ... not yet.  I may be curious to look him up ... that's just me.  How likely do you think I will be willing to connect with him ... not likely.

It is a competitive world out there.  Be careful to mind your manners or people will pay attention and many DO mind if you forget your manners!


“One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preparation.”

~Arthur Ashe 

Social Media or Knowledge Junkie?

“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
~     Stephen Hawking

 

I have a confession to make:  I am BOTH a Social Media AND Knowledge Junkie!  Why do I say this?  Well, self reflection has forced me to discover that I have started to care what people think and have been taking things personally.
 
That, or I need to get a full time career going where my thirst for knowledge and ideas is fueled by having direction and an itinerary for my day.  BUT (strong but) the two go hand in hand.  Social Media is a platform that creates the sharing of information, literary, creative and inspirational messages.  The limitless access to talent from across the globe is like a flashing beacon sucking in to its sphere and the helpfulness side of my nature, drives the need to seek and share content to help others.
 
Ego and pride can interfere with all the best intentions.  I've always considered Social Media a mental attitude of "I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine."  Ultimately, I scratch others by sharing and have fallen into the pit of expecting the same thing. 
 
Two great sayings come to mind:  "Practice the Golden Rule" (treat others as you wish to be treated yourself) and "Make new friends, but keep the old as one is silver and the other gold".  Add a Blog to the equation and you find yourself with a soap box to stand upon and preach from in the form of expressing your opinion.  If you already fall into the trap of being opinionated, you can be swept into the cloud of the dark side of Social Media.
 
Ironically, there is drama.  Often I've thought to myself that Social Media drives you back to high school where the opinions of others influence you and you need to stay disciplined to avoid falling into that trap.  I've done my best to stay clear of the drama with the best intentions, however, by expressing an opinion, you can easily become feeling victimized when not everyone agrees.  If you put yourself out there, you have to expect that not everyone is going to agree.  If you're really discriminating on who you associate with, your friends and followers fall within the boundaries of those you call "friends".  However, keeping loyalties to family and true life friends present conflict with the ones that are social media savvy and are more expressive. 
 
You truly are the company you keep.  Try to keep  yourself surrounded with those that inspire, motivate you by their messages and those that fuel your thirst for knowledge.
 
Twitter is like a gigantic newspaper:  you read the headlines and click on anything and everything that attracts your interest.  No longer are you restricted to your local media (yet it is important to do so if you like to keep up to date).  It is like a fast moving reel of what is going on in the world at that precise moment.  You identify with an addiction to knowledge when you find out something is happening in the real world, and go to Twitter to see if it is trending as if it validates that it is important to everyone else.  It has power.  It gives voice to the voiceless.  It stimulates the causes that need attention.
 
Facebook is where you can more intimately interact with others and uncover better insight into the personalities of people.  It is often used for select friends and family.  I admit, I have two identities:  one for my social media and the other for my close knit of friends and family.  If you have young adult children, you would understand why I do so.  I want to protect their privacy and not throw them into the social media world where there is an abundance of people and opinions.  Quite frankly, they may not be interested in that world.  I let them join my social media world as an option, I try to avoid my soap box and curate good content that is relevant to them and personalize the experience there.
 

“Seven Deadly Sins”


“Wealth without work
Pleasure without conscience
Science without humanity
Knowledge without character
Politics without principle
Commerce without morality
Worship without sacrifice.”


 
Google Plus allows me to frame my circles and although labelling is a bad trait, it can be used constructively.  I have circles of photographers, artists, thought leaders who stimulate me visually and emotionally and are grouped specific to the content that it is surrounded by.  The Group feature is really cool because you become immersed amongst people that share the same interests.  Valuable if you have a specific query on technology, design as a source of education and knowledge.
 
Pinterest has become my visual, creative stimulator and where I curate what I think are amazing.  I gravitate and relate strongly to the Photography and Art boards.  When I need creative inspiration, it is just a click away.  Like anything you enjoy, you tend to become quite good at it.  I love the visual stimulation that talented imagery provides.  It is really cool when you are invited to share on to boards, as reinforcement that others like what you see or think, as what you PIN tends to define who you are.  It is far below being used at its power in marketing, in my opinion.  I find myself congratulating others who have discovered and manipulated to communicate their brand.  Not surprising that it is considerably geared towards the female audience because it is often considered that women are more visual than men.  However, some of the best graphics, artistic and technologically oriented men are using it to share their inner creative side.  Seriously, where can you host all your dreams in one spot?  Goals are what makes us reach out to make ourselves better and reach farther.  If you are consciously capturing this, you are creating intuitive understanding of what motivates and floats your boat. 
 
InstaGRAM is what I use more personally again because my kids, family and their friends are there and again I want to protect their privacy.  As a parent, Facebook used to be where you could get a sense of where your kids were at, but InstaGRAM usually shows you and with whom they're with.  I haven't tried SNAPChat but know it is popular among the younger set who think (and they probably do) what they're up to, where and with whom.  I'm discovering that there are others that share great visual content and inspiration in the ease and immediacy that these platforms allow.  I'm fooling around a bit with Tumbler, Stumble Upon and Reddit similarly but not as loyally as the aforementioned.
 
Now it gets dicey when you start to up your social media culture and influence when you start looking at KRED and KLOUT -- third party independent measurement services that combine unique algorithms.
(WIKIPEDIA  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm) based on your social media usage and followers to determine what kind of influence you have on the internet.  I will set this aside for another post, yet just say that there may be some political influence or strengths of one over the other when one increases your score while the other stays static while it is measuring the same activity.  Peer Index is another one and there is even another that provides your standings based on your geographical location.
 
WIKIPEDIA is always there if you need to uncover something quickly.  There are other sites like "Ask How" that you can find yourself lost in yet wonderful sources to punt you into research mode.  Knowledge is power but it can become dangerous if you tend to take things personally.  Everything should be taken with a grain of salt to be sure.
 
LINKED IN is where I started on Social Media and where I usually start and end my social media day.  Particularly if you're job hunting, a recruiter, or use it to exchange business contacts.  There are again, groups on topics, industries, companies, employers that allow you to maneuver around in.  It is THE perfect spot to centrally host your contacts and document your career.  Recommendations are awesome and Endorsements are fairly new.  How people use them is unique to each character.  I personally only try to Endorse those that I've had direct contact or interaction on the subject matter.
 
 
Avoid Junior High School HI-jinx if you're in a group and dropped out or not included.   Refrain from Social Media if you start to care and you think of it outside and when you're off.  Consistency is key and you don't have to spend as much time on it as it sometimes appears.  Obviously, some people are growing reputations as Social Media, Branding, Content Marketing experts and they may seem more active than others.  However, 10-15 minutes in the morning, over lunch and early evening are key times and really all you need. 
 
If you're in politics, marketing, leading a business, looking for investment, establishing a reputation -- you may need Social Media more than others.  However, like all things good for you (and bad) moderation is key!
 
 
 

“A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot.”
~    
Albert Einstein