If you're SEO you may be SOL

Communicating with acronyms is like using a blow horn with a jet airplane flying overhead.  ~Jeannette Marshall

Remember when we were kids and our parents spelled things between each other so that we couldn't tell what they were talking about?  That was a great tactic before a commitment was made for us all to go for "i-c-e  c-r-e-a-m".    Then we clued in eventually to understanding what that spelling meant.  Next thing, they'd use acronyms for cussing like SOL meaning I was "sh** outta luck".



Today, everyone tosses around acronyms like we should be able to look them up to find their meaning.  Out of curiousity, I went to Wikipedia to see what I would get if I input SEO and it came back with nine (9) variations of what SEO could stand for.


Whenever you work at a large corporation, or otherwise, it is easy to fall into the trap of using acronyms.  Is it because it communicates authority on the topic or is it laziness?


Never ever ASSume that the listener or audience knows what ABC or XYZ means.  Communicate as though you are saying it for the first time.    If you are a SEO specialist, then say something like you "help others increase awareness though their website by marketing".   That way, you may just gain the attention of decision makers outside those in the SEO business.  I have no research to substantiate this, however, I would predict that if you blast or Tweet about increasing SEO return the chances are you will attract other SEO specialists.  Is that what you want?  Or, do you want decision makers who have heard that "SEO" is something that they may need to know about and increase your click thorugh rate?


The more you talk in riddles, and that means acronyms, the more you are possibly alienating those that don't want to be embarrassed by having to ask what they mean.  Yes, it will impress your peers but is that really who your message is targetted at?  Try avoiding acronyms and convey the message for what it is.   I worked at a major sales organization where the culture was so strong that when they were speaking in front of customers, they used all the acronyms they were comfortable using.  Problem was, the audience was too polite or didn't care to ask what they meant.  I believe that acronyms communicates arrogance at times.  When you place them aside, it is amazing how receptive your message will be.


Communicating acronyms is like using a blow horn with a jet airplane flying overhead.  Yes, you are saying something, but it is being drowned out by another noise.   If you really want to stand out, for gosh sakes, just say what you mean in plain English.


***


A read a great Blog on social media   http://tinyurl.com/3y6ynft The Seven Deadly Sins of Social Media -- this can apply to anyone or any organization that is considering marketing through social media (see, that makes more sense than just putting SEO).


You Can't Snow the Snowman: Let Sales Managers be Sales Managers

Sales, more than ever, needs leadership that leads by example.  Why?  Sales professionals are a  quirky, ego-driven group who value success to benchmark -- over achievement on targets, plaques on the wall, etc. At the minimum, sales management has to establish credibility with the team that they're leading.

The challenge to many organizations, however, are those great attributes don't always translate well into sales management.  The  best salespeople don't always make the best sales managers. Managing sales people has to be one of THE most challenging group there is.   It's a rollercoaster ride, regardless to the extent of sales background.

Bluntly:  It is a waste of time and resources having a sales manager as a figurehead.  Very often, everyone wants to jump in the sales game once they smell a live opportunity.  Yet what happens long before that?  Sales reps do know how to survive.  What other occupation is there that potentially pays you nothing or very little unless you produce results?  That survival instinct, allows them to get the heart of opportunities for sales ... at times, that means who will give them the answer they want the quickest.  Many organizations fail their sales managers from this syndrome because at the heart of good intentions is communications or priorities from multiple direction.   The best opportunities sometimes come after a painfully long process or so quick you have to jump on it.  Have a sales manager who is equipped to handle both scenarios with authority.

Let Sales Managers be sales managers and do what you hired or promoted them to do.  What should they do?  Actually, there is a ton!  They manage and hire sales people, right?   What many fail to realize is that there is a lot that has to happen long before that live bait has been hooked.   Included on their job description would be establishing territories and budgets, outlining cold calling or activity metrics, forecasting, qualifying, mandating that CRM (Customer Relationship Management) systems to be updated, analyzing dashboards,  approving proposals or estimating, authoring or proofreading presentations, reviewing sales business plans, even networking and distributing leads fairly.  Did I forget to mention that someone has to enforce those best practices, maintain focuss, coach or motivate, hold accountability in check, and lead by example?

  If the sales manager's boss jumps in at the last minute or to give authority, then why wouldn't a sales rep just go to them to begin with?  After all, salespeople are showman who like to make sure the boss' boss knows they've got a live one!   Essentially, what can happen is that the sales manager's authority is undermined, corners can be cut.  Sales management WORTH can be directly attributed to the support they receive from their managers and organizations,  not just the revenue that is being generated TODAY.  Yet planning, analyzing and forecasting eventually leads to "today".

 Strong sales managers means you can identify and attract talent.  Human Resources and even executives can be tricked into thinking they've found the perfect sales rep because they've been won over by that polish,  articulate smooth talk, sales-ease babble, hunting tactics, fish stories and geez, so damn personable to them they must be able to sell.   Did you see how shiney the shoes were?  Must be "the one". Then there is the snowman.  The true sales manager that can cut through all the decoys and ask for proof, role play with situations, or just know by asking a candidate or employee what they do to be successful, or questions within questions that can cut through the snowjob.

 There are numerous discussions on bad sales managers or whether you should promote your top performer to be a sales manager.  My recommendation would be to focus on what a good sales manager should do and be allowed to do, with your support.  Introducing the sales manager role into an organization can be a challenge from both sides.  Primarily, letting go by those that want to keep their "finger on the pulse".  Mixed-messaging causes more harm than good. You have to believe in the management you have in place, experienced or otherwise.  Build trust between you so that they won't overstep financial risk and have the skills to analyse potentially.  You need to comprehend that you hired them because you believed in what they could do, agreed upon what results would be expected, established timelines and gave authority perimeters.  You both have synergies in styles, expectations and messaging -- so back them up!!

Now you have a few ideas on what a sales manager should do.  Are you going to jump in or trust them to do their job? 

Forecast, project or dart board?

There is much to be said about the debate amongst operations, service and sales regarding forecasts.  All have viable arguments or points of view.   Operations and service  need accurate forecasts to ensure they have the right amount of personnel, inventory and resources to support the sales efforts.   Yet, sales hedges on putting their name on a number.  All points of view need to create a balance  to manage success between the organization and its customers.

I have spoken to numerous entrepreneurs, executives, operations personnel, managers, sales reps and been on both sides of the table.  Even though I have been on the sales side longer, I favor accurate forecasting.   The reason is logically because I care more about delivering on promises to my clients than not getting it right or avoiding accountability.  I "get it" that operations is not a never-ending money train either.  The compromise is to come up with a forecast that balance everyone's needs.  It is also important to note that  it takes significantly more expense, resources and time to generate one new customer (something like 75%) than it does to keep existing customers happy.  Yet, most organizations spend a great deal of effort on winning new customers, especially during uncertain times. 

Forecasting is particularly critical if you are focussed on gaining new customers or when economic conditions are unpredictable.  Organizations are caught between laying off employees prematurely or out of panic, leaving themselves short when a customer does need the added resources or services available.  We know that scientists have confirmed that the chicken did come before the egg.  Forecasting is the chicken and needs to be in place before anything else can be established.  Every organization, with one employee or one thousand, needs to establish where their revenue will come from.  "Forecasting" is just that.   Very few organizations have the cash flow or can survive by what I call "Field of Dreams" mentality:  build it and they will come.


Even without sales professionals on staff, setting realistic goals on attracting and retaining revenue can determine the success or health of your business. 

Unless you are in a large corporate sales environment, the culture for forecasting tends to be less of a requirement.   Yet, from formulating or guesstimating best estimate on each sales professionals predicted revenue by year, by month or even by week will help operations and support their efforts.  It is sometimes called "accountability".  Many sales professionals are uncomfortable with this as they consider it will reflect badly on them if they are off the mark.  However, not assessing their own performance will likely restrict their success anyhow.  Here are a few suggestions I would offer:

  • Understand the full annual territory revenue value, then break down by customer, by month
  • Record the projected new customers by annual value, by month, considering purchase date
  • Assess percentage or ratio of revenue between existing customers and new customers
  • You can take last three months, projected next month that includes new customers, and same month from previous year.  Total all 5 months, divide by 5 to get a forecast amount.
  • Organizations should post results by week, by month or provide access by reps for cross-checking.
The above is a simplified formula to start with.  It is just as important to go back and track your success, boost or modify against actuals.  What I love about doing something like this is, it is just like golf -- you really are competing against your OWN score.  When YOU set the goal, YOU have more of a tendency to make it happen.  If you take it more seriously, you will assess your close ratio.  How accurate are you at predicting your own success rate?  Does it mean you have to make more calls to increase your success rate?  It can also prove to be one of the single most motivating tools you can have.  If your personal goals are aligned with your forecast, you will increase your chances of meeting/exceeding your forecasts.  (Remember that new car, a trip, house, marriage, baby, early retirement ..... etc.)

I won't dwell on it too long because I want to emphasise all the many advantages to forecasting, however, organizations can be their own worst enemy.  For example, they may project what the forecast has to be and then divide it amongst the sales team.  That projection could be based on operational expenses, factoring in commissions, and then profitability.   I can put forth my theory that many private organizations don't share the numbers on projections or post actuals because they don't want everyone to know those numbers ... in other words how much money the owners make.   Some share only lump sums or maybe only larger corporations emphasise profitability to leverage forecast requirements under a budget, target or plan.

What this all comes down to is accountability.  If you are a sales professional, you should have a handle on where your revenue will come from.  Sales reps should up the ante through increased activity if a customer or prospect doesn't come through.  Where the true value comes from is when you, after practice, become  more accurate with time, like golf.    Organizations would win by recognizing accurate forecasting.  Both sides benefit when there are real numbers to work from.  The customer wins the most by having the high level of service and product they envisioned. 

Accurate forecasting eliminates mistrust from sales who spin tales to save face or ease pressure of unachievable projections.  Organizations reduce buffering or stretching numbers.  If an organization feels they have to set the budget higher to stretch their sales team, then they may have a completely different issue to consider.  One might be to buy a dart board.

Feedback is learning.  Please comment, share or provide your own opinion on this Blog.