Forecast, project or dart board?

There is much to be said about the debate amongst operations, service and sales regarding forecasts.  All have viable arguments or points of view.   Operations and service  need accurate forecasts to ensure they have the right amount of personnel, inventory and resources to support the sales efforts.   Yet, sales hedges on putting their name on a number.  All points of view need to create a balance  to manage success between the organization and its customers.

I have spoken to numerous entrepreneurs, executives, operations personnel, managers, sales reps and been on both sides of the table.  Even though I have been on the sales side longer, I favor accurate forecasting.   The reason is logically because I care more about delivering on promises to my clients than not getting it right or avoiding accountability.  I "get it" that operations is not a never-ending money train either.  The compromise is to come up with a forecast that balance everyone's needs.  It is also important to note that  it takes significantly more expense, resources and time to generate one new customer (something like 75%) than it does to keep existing customers happy.  Yet, most organizations spend a great deal of effort on winning new customers, especially during uncertain times. 

Forecasting is particularly critical if you are focussed on gaining new customers or when economic conditions are unpredictable.  Organizations are caught between laying off employees prematurely or out of panic, leaving themselves short when a customer does need the added resources or services available.  We know that scientists have confirmed that the chicken did come before the egg.  Forecasting is the chicken and needs to be in place before anything else can be established.  Every organization, with one employee or one thousand, needs to establish where their revenue will come from.  "Forecasting" is just that.   Very few organizations have the cash flow or can survive by what I call "Field of Dreams" mentality:  build it and they will come.


Even without sales professionals on staff, setting realistic goals on attracting and retaining revenue can determine the success or health of your business. 

Unless you are in a large corporate sales environment, the culture for forecasting tends to be less of a requirement.   Yet, from formulating or guesstimating best estimate on each sales professionals predicted revenue by year, by month or even by week will help operations and support their efforts.  It is sometimes called "accountability".  Many sales professionals are uncomfortable with this as they consider it will reflect badly on them if they are off the mark.  However, not assessing their own performance will likely restrict their success anyhow.  Here are a few suggestions I would offer:

  • Understand the full annual territory revenue value, then break down by customer, by month
  • Record the projected new customers by annual value, by month, considering purchase date
  • Assess percentage or ratio of revenue between existing customers and new customers
  • You can take last three months, projected next month that includes new customers, and same month from previous year.  Total all 5 months, divide by 5 to get a forecast amount.
  • Organizations should post results by week, by month or provide access by reps for cross-checking.
The above is a simplified formula to start with.  It is just as important to go back and track your success, boost or modify against actuals.  What I love about doing something like this is, it is just like golf -- you really are competing against your OWN score.  When YOU set the goal, YOU have more of a tendency to make it happen.  If you take it more seriously, you will assess your close ratio.  How accurate are you at predicting your own success rate?  Does it mean you have to make more calls to increase your success rate?  It can also prove to be one of the single most motivating tools you can have.  If your personal goals are aligned with your forecast, you will increase your chances of meeting/exceeding your forecasts.  (Remember that new car, a trip, house, marriage, baby, early retirement ..... etc.)

I won't dwell on it too long because I want to emphasise all the many advantages to forecasting, however, organizations can be their own worst enemy.  For example, they may project what the forecast has to be and then divide it amongst the sales team.  That projection could be based on operational expenses, factoring in commissions, and then profitability.   I can put forth my theory that many private organizations don't share the numbers on projections or post actuals because they don't want everyone to know those numbers ... in other words how much money the owners make.   Some share only lump sums or maybe only larger corporations emphasise profitability to leverage forecast requirements under a budget, target or plan.

What this all comes down to is accountability.  If you are a sales professional, you should have a handle on where your revenue will come from.  Sales reps should up the ante through increased activity if a customer or prospect doesn't come through.  Where the true value comes from is when you, after practice, become  more accurate with time, like golf.    Organizations would win by recognizing accurate forecasting.  Both sides benefit when there are real numbers to work from.  The customer wins the most by having the high level of service and product they envisioned. 

Accurate forecasting eliminates mistrust from sales who spin tales to save face or ease pressure of unachievable projections.  Organizations reduce buffering or stretching numbers.  If an organization feels they have to set the budget higher to stretch their sales team, then they may have a completely different issue to consider.  One might be to buy a dart board.

Feedback is learning.  Please comment, share or provide your own opinion on this Blog.

When the going gets tough, the tough go HUNTING!

Can you imagine if we all went to sleep tonight and woke up tomorrow morning in the caveman era? If we don’t starve first, we’d be bruised from fighting each other to get the only small morsel of food left! Ugg.

In today’s world, the terrain is wider from globalization, yo-yo financial uncertainty, or confusing tools.  Guess what? Nothing has changed. Everyone is STILL fighting for that small morsel. Today’s hunters come in all forms, genders and technical know how.

That small morsel of food is smaller and more evasive and it is called “customers”. With many economies soft, organizations limping along, the spotlight on sales and marketing is brighter than ever before. Organizations should be looking for hunters, not farmers, and least of all order takers. Sales professionals have evolved into order takers because they leave the office to existing customers’ offices -- that is not hunting. Organizations can hire additional customer care personnel at a fraction of the cost to take care of existing customers (wasn’t it Sam Walton who said it best: “Take care of your customer or else your competitor will”?)

With eyes shifting between sales and new customers, forward thinking organizations are investing more in technology or tools to maximize results. Those clever, slick sales rep can be so personable, chat about sports stats or baffle everyone with sales-speak. Now, survival instinct kicks in to realize who they really need are hunters to keep that food, keep up the cave … rocks in the pocket are less important.

Organizations are reading books, talking to sales trainers, bringing in guest speakers -- all  from people who were once sales pros but make a better living telling a BIGGER story!   The organizations start believing they might have grasped some of it, start asking their own sales folk what they’re doing. Out comes the baffling speak that sounds somewhat logical. For added drama, sports score stats are now replaced with sad stories about the economy or what support they're not getting or they would do better if they just had this or that. It all makes sense, sorta.

Just ask people about cold calling and you will get a variety of definitions. If it’s your sales reps, they will tell you that cold calling went out before Glengarry Glen Ross went to DVDs.  There are now bloggers and sales sites saying you don't have to cold call anymore for backup.  That is just wrong!

As the economy has become uncertain, ongoing changes guaranteed, you HAVE to keep the " bucket full" to protect against the unfortunate event that existing customers slow down or halt completely.

What organizations need today, as always, are hunters. True hunters are cold calling, making appointments with nonbuyers, qualifying prospects to test opportunity potential, predicting reasonable success ratios, creating unique presentations and proposals that address unique needs, then following up effectively to close. Time spent should be minimum 6 hours a day out of the office in front of prospects. Time for 2/3 of their efforts on new business development with 1/3 on existing customers. Time to reverse the lazier habits, one being calling on the same customers that are already doing business, easier to get in front of and some times can be upsold.

The challenge many organizations face is understanding what they should realistically be able to ask for combined with what should be expected in return. Taking a cue from the top sales organizations’ culture, it would be to set up "best practices" whereby every sales rep is given daily goals broken down by cold calls, in person calls, presentations, proposals and service calls. Based on the cost of what they’re selling does impact the sales cycle and can reduce some of the numbers. However, establishing “best practices” sales metrics on activity is the most assured way for an organization to establish realistic goals and evaluate their return on investment.

The best recommendation I can give to organizations, especially smaller ones who may not be comfortable understanding reasonable expectations from their sales team would be to consider a CRM system.  After working with Goldmine, ACT!, customized systems, the one I favor is Salesforce.com.  The benefits are as follows:
  • 24/7 accessibility, from home, office, anywhere
  • E-Learning sessions for users, managers, administrators
  • Integrates with all members of the team -- sales, customer service, technical and other support
  • Everyone connected to the same system -- speaking the same language, internal communications
  • Managers can assess dashboards, do forecasting, etc.
  • Allows benchmarking top performers activity
  • Keeps everyone honest
Top sales pros understand the value of CRM systems, or other means of documenting activity, planning/forecasting.  They do NOT consider it "big brother".   Organizations understand the value gained from the ability to accurately forecast, predict ROI, and proactively implement contingency plans.

Cold calling, like hunting, will stay around even if the cavemen haven’t.
Enhanced by Zemanta

The rules haven't changed in sales basics

People buy from people. That hasn't changed over many generations. Yet, how we interact with customers and prospects certainly have.

Professionally, I just had to take the "Introduction to SEO/SME" online course by Google that I was fortunate to gain access because it was a qualifying step to exceed 75% to move on for an interview with one of their partners.  Ironically, the talent scout told me after I'd passed that in less that a week, he'd had to tell 4 other people ACTIVELY in the field that they wouldn't move forward because they didn't pass the test.

I am sharing this because I actively started a BLOG even before that, signed up to TWITTER around the same time. Next up will be FACEBOOK. I, like so many others, considered these avenues for keeping in touch with family/friends.   I look at it humorously at times to see what is really going on in my teenagers lives.  Ask them in person and everything is cool.  You don't have to wait to ask on Facebook, they're prepared to tell  a world of aquaintances, even strangers, what is on their mind.

What startled me recently was a study released just over a week ago that by 2014, Social Media will replace e-mail. What startled me more was the parents dinner a couple of weeks ago while we were out of town for a soccer tournament with our 16/17 y/o daughters -- we were told then that "e-mail is old fashioned". We all were shocked, with our Blackberries and iPhones, close at hand.  How could that be?  Yet if truth be told, if did want to reach them, they won't pick up the phone but they'll respond to a text.   Pretty soon, I will have to read their blogs to find out what really is going on in their heads, where our parents could just simply ask us, even if we still edited what we told them. 

Yet it hasn't changed in sales or business.  People still  buy from people and face to face is ALWAYS best!! However, as sales professionals keep trying to get in front of key decision makers, it is becoming more challenging when there are more shields for us to penetrate or for them to hide behind.  It's no longer just the Gatekeepr.

Time to roll up your sleeves and get back to the basics of sales. You have to create a compelling business reason or establish value in order to earn the right to see a decision maker personally.  That hasn't changed.  Unfortunately, with all the new media, ongoing changes, if we think we're confused, imagine how much more e-mail/social media/tweets our prospects are weeding through, eating up their time, allowing them even less time to meet with sales professionals.   The circle is more crowded.  Decision makers need us to help them weed through the good, the bad and the ugly, now more than ever before.

A good ole fashion approach letter, on letter head, with handwritten addressee, a real postage stamp (not from a metre) would be such a relief, I'm sure they'd welcome something other than a flyer or e-mail to read!!  You still have to go further and be able to say how you are going to make their life easier, save them time, improve the bottom line, increase revenue ... before they even consider the less precious moments they have to spare.

I just put forth my opinion on sustainability (previous BLOG Hogwash, Brainwash, Greenwash or Lipgloss) that's another issue that is clouding key decision making criteria that is causing debate on how valid it is.

SUSTAINABILITY: Hogwash, Greenwash, Brainwash or Lipgloss?

Do you consider sustainability Hogwash, Greenwash, Brainwash or Lipgloss? 

Depending on where you stand, you might sit under one banner.  A Hogwasher may be someone who may be more of a traditionalist who views it just another thing that people are hyped up about that will soon settle down or be replaced by something like 'social media'. 

A Greenwashers may consider those on the GREEN bandwagon, tree huggers, or creating hype or scaring people with "global warming" warning. 

A Brainwasher could be someone who thinks that they've always considered themselves kind to their environment so they don't need someone preaching to them how they are suppose to do something differently.

What about a Lipglosser?  I would say they are in a position that dictates that they cannot ignore that sustainability is an important issue to many, so they better promote themselves or their organization as a caring one.  Don't take my word for it.  Look for yourself, to see how many free images with palms open holding dirt or a seedling to be sure you don't forget to include on your messaging.

Don’t get me started on acronyms as that is being saved for another blog. The idea of sustaintability is something that I hold dear to my heart and yet I wonder if it has been glossed over, compartmentalized like I just did, like so many things, because it’s so timely or “sexy” in referencing.

Let’s get it out in the open and then take each step. What does sustainability mean as it relates to business and marketing.

If you want to understand how the environmental issues are impacting businesses, it is far easier if you have a scientific brain to process "how to reduce carbon footprint"  or ask an organization if it has to pay "carbon taxes" that starts to create dialogue on things that impact their bottom line.    Those that say environmentalists are "tree huggers" was probably have said  the Beatles were a long haired bunch of hippies that wouldn't last in the 1960s -- yet look at how much influence their music and lyrics hit us everyday - on the radio or in advertisements.

To ignore that environmental-influenced buying decisions better not watch CNN or updates on what is happening in Iraq or how BP's Gulf tragedy.  Of course, they impact global financial markets.  We just don't do much about it until it's time to gripe at how much we have to pay at the pump.

Interestingly, as I have conversations with some key decision makers they strike social media and sustainability as something that is appealing today, that will have its time, but go on to other issues. Their previous generation probably said that about the internet.  Then they want to go back to strategies on increase revenue, reduce costs or streamline process.

To ignore environmentally influenced buying decisions is like ignoring how social media will impact how we communicate. So far, many of us, me included, attributed social media as a means to communicate our going ons with friends and family.

You see, there are ways in which to communicate, that relies on anything than paper. Online information has been around as long as Google and inquisitiveness.   There are many solutions available.

Social media really is a means to help the environment. It CAN reduce our footprint. By communicating online, via e-mail or social media, you are not printing on paper. Ironically, the most vocal on sustainability are paper companies. There is the FSC, another acronym, that says that you are printing on environmentally friendly paper or with environmentally friendly printers. It is certainly a start. Yet to think that the main pushers of FSC certification are paper manufacturers is quite crazy! They promote paper products that have less impact on the environment.

So now qualified printers have to prove that they use less environmentally impacted inks and papers to cooincide with your organizations’ sustainable program, but certifying that they are FSC certified?  I've seen it live where someone thinks FSC is ineffective or how I would categorize as "Lipgloss".

As a seasoned business owner or sales professional, take the time to ask your clients or prospects what their personal views are on sustainability.  Ask deeper questions on what corporate initiatives they have in place for sustainability -- don't be surprised if many say they "recycle their paper more" as their contribution.  If you want to find interesting data to introduce sustainability dialogue, just Google "toxic toners"  and you will find a hornets nest after a study in 2007 after Queensland University of Technology Professor Lydia Morawsky released a  study saying that office laser printer could be damaging to your health.  Professor Lydia Morawska found that melted printer toner turns into tiny liquid particles that can be breathed in ...  the debate continues still.

Creating compelling business discussions can create value to those you are finally getting a chance to meet face to face and do something other than a feature/product dump.  Sustainability is not Hogwash, as organizations examine their own corporate culture or what they deem necessary.   I just ask that we refrain from Lipgloss --  for the sake of a marketing campaign --do it for the sake of what it means – reducing your footprint.  Ask your customers what you, your product, service or organization can do to help.

This customer is so rude!

A question was posted on LINKED IN by Desmond: "What's the most professional way of overcoming a client's professional discourtesy? i.e. Not returning phone calls, emails, or failing to follow through on committments, etc."

My response is that it is YOUR perception and not the clients that they are being discourteous. Are they really a client or are they a prospect? It sounds more to me that they are a prospect with a proposal you've provided and now they’re stalling. Why I say that is because if you have a true client/sales rep relationship, you will have gained permission to be on their active response radar.  You may not have earned the right to say they're being discourteous if you haven't established TRUST  (see earlier BLOG Who can you TRUST?).

I would turn the lack of response back on myself, asking myself why they may not be returning my calls or e-mails or whether I've established myself as an equal business partner.  That is someone with whom they are more inclined to take my calls because they associate me with "value".   It would tell me that am not yet considered someone who is there to help solve their problems or bring them information/services/products that they are looking for.

If they are a prospect, and they aren’t responding in the way you think they should, then I’d be certain that you have not given them a compelling reason for them to talk to you.  If buyers sense the only reason you are calling them is to "sell" them something, most people are programmed to avoid emails/phone calls from sales reps if they are not in the market for what you are selling or regardless if they've asked you to give them the proposal.  Face it -- circumstances can change from the time you were asked to prove the proposal.

Personally/professionally I always try to return calls and communicate that my needs are being taken care of at present, however, welcome updates to product offerings for such a time as I am researching/looking. Many buyers don't think the same way.  Consider the fact that some decision makers are simply busy, having less time to respond to every e-mail or telephone call.  Have you tried a real letter by snail mail, that shows that you've taken extra time on your end just after the meeting but before the proposal reminding them of the reasons why they considered you in the first place,  based on real results/improvements they'll have ($ or %)?

Desmond went on to highlight what perceived delays that gave cause to the perception they were being rude:

1. Agreed to pay on a certain date, and still hasn't;

2. A deposit is involved, but now they're asking for a free sample or preview

3. They agreed to call back with critical information to meet the deadline, and doesn't, but expects you to maintain your stated deadline

4. They fail to meet commitments for appointments, phone calls, follow ups, information repeatedly.

Desmond is right that they maybe stalling, however, I emphasize finding out the real reason. My first reaction, would always be direct and don’t skate around asking direct questions. There is always a logical explanation to what you perceive as a delay. An example could be to ask them if there is someone else in the organization that you should be talking to review the information with? Or come right out and ask "what is preventing them from making the deposit", or "how their schedule has changed from what was agreed on".

There are many disreputable organizations out there.  They cause viable business reasons as to why you may be asked to provide them with a sample or preview -- which can cause a stalemate or chicken/egg syndrome. Ask how the sample or preview is going to help go to the next step?  It may show that they don't have as much decision making authority as they've led you to believe and that there is someone else behind the scenes.  I would do what I could to  provide a "trial" or "sample" because hesitation on my end may communicate lack of confidence in what I'm trying to get them to buy.  If samples/previews are out of the question, then provide testimonials and references at the minimum.

If they're stalling on a deposit - that is telling you they may not have the money, have the ability to send the check or you are not dealing with the decision maker, but a gatekeeper.  You may have to face that you are wasting your time. Give yourself permission to let go.  Recognize that not every prospect is a good one and move on.  Spend  time with those you share a give/take healthy exchange.   Effective qualifying is why top performers get results (see BLOG What is Qualification in Sales?).  Be thankful to free up your time to spend with those that value what you are offering or can meet your criteria such as a deposit.

One of my first jobs in sales, I was asking questions of a veteran operations person ... and every answer came back to me that "clients lie".  (This may be a little over the top yet your support team can sometimes think this more often then they are telling you).  Relax, it is very common that people don't get back at agreed time but expect you to maintain the original deadline.

You may be forcing the issue because it is you or your organization’s target that is the deadline, not the customers. Sales gimics such as “first 100 customers” or “buy now and save” are to try to get a high conversion. I’d like to find a situation where if you have money in hand, all matters qued up, your sale will be turned away (of course, there are real circumstances, but far fewer, that actually are REAL deadlines). Give credit to buyers, consumers or decision makers that they are smart.

If you want to really establish long term relationships, I suggest you portray yourself as patient, empathetic and try understanding the real reason for the the perceived “rudeness”.  If nothing else, the customer REALLY does have a legitimate reason for 1-4.  It is your perception that they are not meeting what you need.  

Bottom line -- the CUSTOMER establishes the criteria/timelines/delays .... never the sales rep or their organization.

TWITTER:  http://twitter.com/OptioneerJM

Who can you TRUST? Trustworthiness is the most important characteristic to have in sales

I participated in a discussion forum generated from the question posed on what really counts when selling print? The same answer applies to most any form of sales: TRUST.

If you ask most customers to choose, they will say either/or Quality and Service, with price being last. Other attributes emerging in today’s technological environment will require adding technical know-how, business savvy, produce results, etc.

There is only ONE thing  that is important in selling and that is TRUST!

I like to back up my comments with examples. Think financial/security printing. The customer has to TRUST that you will deliver on time, accurately.

One of my former sales managers,  cited a survey results asked of decision makers. The most important characteristic in their relationship with sales folk is the ability to TRUST.

A contributor to the discussion made a great point that you cannot establish TRUST without engaging EMPATHY. In my opinion, empathy transpires from asking the right questions. I agree with this, but it is still a bit more. You have to be able to DISCUSS what their issues are – no different than what you do in your personal relationship building. You ask questions to get familiar with the individual, you establish empathy for their problems, you offer suggestions that are appropriate, you discuss what you know/they know and from that you decide that there are many things you have in common that you decide you would like to keep in touch. That grows into association and then if you’re lucky – mutual TRUST, respect and friendship.

When your discussions with clients start out by "I was wondering if you could ..." or "How soon would you be able to ...." or "I need ...." -- definite signs that you've established TRUST. Those words come along with anxiety for production typically .... so be sure to have a strong team on side to help you deliver on your promises.

On the flip side, the biggest deal-breaker with decision makers by sales professionals is “over promising and under delivering”.

One way to ensure you can build TRUST is by being able to work with your T-E-A-M – your TEAM are those that help you deliver on what you promise. You'll find the most successful reps gain the respect of their team, if not always favored by their demands. There can sometimes be a fine line between coming across as being unreasonably demanding to your support TEAM and being able to communicate effectively how much you need their help to deliver on promises made by you based on what your customer’s needs are. One of the best ways to ensure this, is to engage them, if possible, BEFORE you make any commitments.

When you set up your support team for success, you will find they will leap over tall buildings to get your customer what they need. It’s their pride in delivering and by including them and sharing the credit with them, will almost guarantee you will deliver on promises. Then, you will be able to trust.

Many organizations believe that their sales reps need to be technical. Yes, you do …. to a point. Another great manager, who WAS fun, Jim Thom, used to advise me not to get too caught up with the technical side with my clients (as long as I understood): "It doesn't matter if there are chickens in the back doing the work, as long as its done on time, great quality, at the price agreed".

Others define successful selling interpreted by being able to sell at C-Level (in layman’s terms the executive or highest level decision maker). When you being too technical at the C-Suite, chances are they will not be technical. What will happen then is they will bring in the troops of IT Managers who won’t miss a chance to show off their talent (which they have in their space a great deal of, one of which is avoiding sales people at all costs).

Another way to help establish TRUST with C-Level is to portray that you, too, are high level. Most people like to deal with those in “the club” or those they consider equals. If you don’t ask the right questions or you take the chance to be in front of them to do your feature or benefits dump, see how quickly they will bring in a manager’s who will grind you on price.

If you want to qualify or test the strength of your trust, try asking a question like “what keeps you awake at night?” Most people are honest. If you are trying to form a winning business relationship, you will try to help them solve some of those issues even if it means calling in the troups to help you deliver. Don't forget to share the glory!

Talking Turkey about .ppt Presentations

So, you've been asked to "to put together a few slides to present" to your mgt, colleagues, community, or as an expert on a topic ... now what?

Public speaking, which includes presenting .ppt, is the number one fear, over death, divorce, poverty, etc. Hopefully, some insight can reduce most of your tremors. Many people are either great at putting together a great .ppt or presenting, few master both.

Many organizations and most corporations culture require .ppt -- there are many benefits and reasons as to why. I simply believe its because its a guide to what you are saying and saves you time in the long run!

A link was shared on LINKED IN, yes an intentional pun, (Death by Powerpoint by Alex Kapterev) with a eye-opening statistic that there are 300 million .ppt users in the world! Now, that got me thinking!! Here are a few of my own tips:

1) Prepare a dozen (no more) powerful slides (Alex's .ppt slides had way too many with 61 slides!!)

2) Make sure it reflects your personality and presentation style

3) Rehearse, rehearse, REHEARSE!! The .ppt should be a backdrop to what you are saying

4) If asked to do a presentation from an existing .ppt -- give it an overhaul regardless of whether you think you should use the existing one -- the number of slides reduced, the graphics way up,

5) By having very minimal points, more graphics, you will be forced to prepare and you cannot simply read from the .ppt -- which is the way to murder a presentation and put your audience to sleep!

6) With minimal slides and maximum rehearsal, you will be more engaged with your audience to watch body language, engagement.

7) You should be watching your audience -- body language, etc. -- not the .ppt -- they will help you set the tempo

8) Audience size should influence how you present. Smaller audiences allow you to ask if they're following without breaking for questions to lose the momentum

9) The BEST .ppt I've ever seen was doing research -- Steve Jobs on unveiling the iPAD -- on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poaUbmdUcCY&feature=channel

a) Steve Jobs is probably not the most dynamic speaker so its obvious he rehearsed
b) The .ppt is incredible -- unfortunately, we all don't have a team available to help us like Steve did -- graphics, flash, etc.
c) This is a great example where preparation + ppt make who/what could be boring into something more interesting

10) If its a small audience, have a number of handouts printed and be prepared to give them AFTER your presentation. If you give them beforehand, they will be flipping through them and not paying attention to you. If its a larger audience, you can include or ask people to request a soft copy so you can follow up/send afterwards.

11) An adage that was drummed into me at Toastmasters that can be used to act as your guide (reminded by LINKED IN member George Dunn):

a) Tell 'em what you're going to tell 'em
b) Tell 'em
c) Tell 'me what you told 'em

12) Join Toastmasters to sharpen your skills in an environment that encourages you to test your speaking skills with other folk that are in the same boat. There are thousands of clubs in a variety of formats, times, etc.

On that note, someone was promoting himself/org on a YouTube presentation. I was overwhelmed with the urge that I acted on. My feedback to him was to recommend he attend Toastmasters because his umms and ahhhhs discredited a lot of what he was saying and he was going to lose viewers based on that.

A mentor of mine from Toastmasters had a saying "if you talk like a turkey, take the turkey out of your talk" ... by joining TM.

QUALIFICATION versus RESULTS

A new sales veteran pal of mine, Mel Harding, (on LINKED IN) VP Product Development of Occulus.com and I have been exchanging and participating in discussions on qualifying.

Everyone knows that they've heard the term "qualify" or told that qualify is part of the sales process. My definition lends it as a method to identify a quality sales prospect or lead to boost success ratio. Yet, I'm of the opinion its considered just more sales jargon with only the most dedicated sales professional or sophisticated sales organizations understand.

I can certainly appreciate why a website service such as "Occulus" would be started. For many of us that have worked for major sales organizations like Xerox, Digital, IKON, etc. these tools are developed for us and are part of the process/accepted practice.

Qualifying IS the one part of sales that IS rocket science! Think of it as another tool in your tool box along with cold calling, objections, closing, relationship selling, etc. You have to be able to more than simply understand not only who you are targeting or engaged in sales with, you have to RECOGNIZE who a qualified prospect/customer is. Check out their website www.occulus.com to get a feel for what I'm talking about. This is NOT to be confused with CRM systems which capture and communicate information about prospects/customers. The various methods of qualifications are about identification, understanding you/customers/competitors, diagnostics, formulas,etc. It can be simplified by asking if you know if you are talking to the key decision maker .... who have gatekeepers who's major priority is to keep sales people away. Talk about contradiction!

When I've worked with smaller companies and try taking them down the "qualification" path they think I'm over-complicating the sales process, not getting results fast enough and what the heck am I doing all this analysis for! Fortunately, others might say "I get it" whereas they don't. The quality of your qualification process will uncover a strong identification of prospects that can save a lot of time in the long run, increase your success rate PLUS make more lucrative successes than smaller hits most consider "results". That's why some organizations distinguish sales reps from mainstream to major accounts ... meaning the larger the revenue opportunity, the longer the sales cycle.

Another compelling reason for capturing a qualification process. This other company I worked for had a Sales Director with 20-30 years industry experience. This gentleman knew how to price based on who they were competing against, the time of year, even the sales rep. What do you think happened when he left? How would others know what he had in his head?

So, get that scientific brain working and start qualifying better. Also remember, the best opportunities are the ones that are found in unchartered territories. By careful examination and identification (i.e. qualification) you will feel more confident to go down the longer, windier path where your solution, service or product will fill a void. Otherwise, you best get your call activity way way UP in order to get those results!

Please comment or keep me posted on how you're doing in the world of business "optioneering".

Jeannette

Is COLD CALLING really necessary?

Cold calling is always necessary in any times, any industry, any target company size. The how/what/where is the gem.

I consider "cold calling" active, personal research. You can uncover potential clients or opportunities that you would not otherwise find, unless you do.

Most people are afraid of sales because they strongly align it with "cold calling" .... yet it is active/personal research on ways of gaining customer intelligence. You can collect Annual Reports, etc.

In a world where we (I include myself) can easily hide behind e-mail and social media ... seeing a live person is compelling. I don't think "gatekeepers" are interrupted as much as many would think by salespeople pitching their wares ... unless they're selling cookbooks or copiers.

If you approach cold calling with a fun attitude that it's an adventure - you're on a scavenger hunt, looking for hidden treasure. The pirates are the "gatekeepers" guarding the treasure.

What is QUALIFICATION in sales?

It's that old selling example of selling ice to an eskimo.

I say the eskimo has not been qualified appropriately. If you "qualify" the eskimo, you would ask him where he plans to put the ice, how he plans on using it, and if it is going to be in his igloo how long does it have to last? Does the eskimo have to discuss the purchase of ice with someone else or does he have the coins in his pocket? You may also want to ask how often he needs ice (determine pricing and/or future opportunity)?

Through the qualification process -- which is asking a ton of questions -- it comes down to patience and commitment to uncover the real need or opportunity.

If I were to sell ice to an eskimo, I'd end up selling a refridgerator!

Yes, it would have been much easier and quicker to sell him ice, which would mean I did my job. Yet, if I ended up selling him a refrigerator, he'd be much happier, most likely refer me to other eskimos who have only thought of buying ice, and I'd end up looking outstanding!

To me, it isn't rocket science -- it results from clear qualification.